Whatever.......

Yeah...whatever, my grade for Design Studio just announced...not too bad, not too good, right in between. Well, I could say that it is expected as I'm not good in doing this kind of digital works. Thanks to my buddy Alvin, without you I probably couldn't finish my animation....I appreciate your help, man. No matter what, I still think that I've produced a nice architecture without need to making up story saying how "emergent" my architecture is. I wasn't meaning that what'd been done by others were bad or useless in fact they're just not my cup of tea. Compared to those "emergent" architect such as Zaha Hadid(again, I just refer to her works, I didn't copied them!!! Those who're really understand my project would discovered that I've designed it by my own way.), Daniel Libeskind, Frank Gehry, Greg Lynn, Nox and so fourth, I'm more interested in the work of Geoffrey Bawa, Doshi, Charles Correa,Jimmy Lim and so fourth. I think their architecture have something that the digital architecture doesn't has, - "human values". This semester's design were about experimental design and "emergence", yeah I know, and these architect came out with many theories" however I've some little doubt....if what you guys saying were so true and powerful, howcome what you guys so called "emergent" architecture were only built at rich and advanced city? Is it because they required large amount of money to build? Are they required sophisticated technologies in the construction?? When these so called "sustainable" architecture was built, are they really effective as they should?? Are they really sustainable in people's psychological and emotional aspects??